Home / Front Page/ Financial Transaction Levy to rake in Rs. 8 b or Rs. 47 b?

Financial Transaction Levy to rake in Rs. 8 b or Rs. 47 b?

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:19


By Charumini de Silva

Confusion reigned on Friday at a post-Budget forum in Colombo over the actual amount the Government was planning to raise via the new Financial Transaction Levy (FTL).

In the 2017 Budget presented by Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake on Thursday, a new Financial Transaction Levy (FTL) of Rs. 5 for every Rs. 10,000 cash transaction was proposed, including Easy Cash by banks and other financial institutions. This levy, Karunanayake justified was a contribution for social development. FTL will be treated as expenditure for income purposes.

Additionally, the Finance Minister also announced a fee of 2% on cash transactions above Rs. 5 million.  This was to discourage cash transactions. However, the levy is not applicable on any transaction carried out through the banking channels including through cheques, telegraphic transfers, Bank drafts, etc.

outside-lead-1-ndb-director-and-ceo-rajendra-theagarajahNDB Director and CEO 

Rajendra Theagarajah

In the annexures to 2017 Budget, revenue earmarked from the FTL was put as Rs. 8 billion.

However, at the KPMG forum on 2017 Budget, veteran banker Rajendra Theagarajah noted that FTL could actually be looking at raking far more than the estimated figure. 

He said that according to the Central Bank Annual Report 2015, Rs. 95 trillion goes through the Payments and Settlement System, including real time gross settlement (RTGS), and after applying 0.5% the number is around Rs. 47 billion, which is fairly significant in terms of contribution towards revenue. 

 “From a revenue point of view, the levy looks attractive but if there is going to be a charge then you are basically shaving off one half of the revenue from the systems,” Theagarajah cautioned.

However, in response Karunanayake said FTL was present to prevent any grey areas or danger elements on cash transactions which often occur with the help of professionals. 

“Our intention is not to charge from one particular individual, but to broad base collections. For anybody who encashes more than Rs. 5 million, we have specified a fee. We don’t want to be like Modi and take Rs. 5,000 notes out of circulation,” Karunanayake added, referring to India’s unprecedented measure to curb money laundering by withdrawing the INR 1,000 and INR 500 notes from circulation. 


Questions over prudence of directed bank lending; Ravi K justifies

The Government’s decision to direct banks to lend to specific sectors, almost collectively 50%, has caused concern in the financial services industry.

In presenting the 2017 Budget Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake said: “I also directed banks to ensure that at least 10% of their lending portfolio is for agriculture, 10% for SME, 10% for exports, 10% for tourism, 5% for youth and 5% for women. 

I further directed the banks to lend at least 15% of the deposits within the same area for business development.”

Veteran banker Rajendra Theagarajah at the KPMG forum on 2017 Budget questioned the prudence of directing banks to channel lending to specified sectors. 

He highlighted that banking sector has a significant componet of institutional investors and having mandatory lending policies in banks often makes these large scale investors nervous. Hence, he requested clarity on the proposal.

In response Karunanayake said that bank licenses are given by the Government to do banking and not for unrelated activities. 

“The proposal was a call from the banks to look at the Government policies and lend towards certain projects. That’s why we want to drive 50% of the lending book to specific areas. Every bank is posting a Rs. 15 b profit after tax (PAT), hence we want the banks to take a risk and spraed it out. It is not a mandate, but a request from the Government. It is a ‘may’ instead of a ‘shall’,” Finance Minister added. (CDS)

Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

Our Cricket Board simply cannot deliver – why not they all quit honourably?

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

“It is necessary, therefore, for the Government to pay serious attention to the doings of Sri Lanka Cricket [board] and take immediate action to lift their game for the progress of our glorious game.” Question for Sri Lanka Cricket (board) Sri La

Yesterday Tamils, today Muslims and tomorrow who?

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

From the time of S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike’s election victory in 1956, one and only one issue had dominated political party campaigns in this country; and that was communalism. The Tamil community was the main focus of these campaigns for over 50 years

Those who go by social proof are easy prey to crafty schemers

Monday, 17 June 2019

Going after social proof Swiss writer and novelist, Rolf Dobelli, in one of the essays in his 2013 book ‘The Art of Thinking Clearly’, has given a fine warning to his readers. He has warned against going by ‘social proof’ or ‘majority view

Poson ponderings on positional power: ‘Authority vested’ vs. ‘authority wasted’

Monday, 17 June 2019

We witnessed a serene Poson Poya, in a far more improved security setting in Sri Lanka. Whilst the Sri Lankan life slowly returning to normal, political fronts do not appear to show the same. Has the political power become the people ‘pava’ (sin)

Columnists More