Home / News/ Govt. to retain family background reports despite protests

Govt. to retain family background reports despite protests


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Thursday, 6 October 2016 01:09

Facebook

By Chathuri Dissanayake

All female migrant workers will need the controversial Family Background Report (FBR) in the future, under new proposals approved by the Cabinet this week despite the report coming under fire from activists for its alleged discriminatory and regressive nature which specifically targets women.   bup_dftdft-6

The Cabinet on Tuesday approved a proposal by Foreign Employment Minister Thalatha Athukorala to retain the FBR as a means of evaluating eligibility for women to go abroad. Accordingly, a committee chaired by the Divisional Secretary will evaluate each hopeful migrant’s eligibility. The committee, which will include a Child Rights Promotion Officer, Early Childhood Development Officer, Medical Officer of Health and Development Officer assigned by the Foreign Ministry, will meet once a month to evaluate candidates, ministry sources said.  

The FBR report faced severe criticism from different rights groups for its discrimination based on gender and employment category. The requirement to file a report on family background was first limited to domestic workers although Cabinet approval was given in 2013 for a blanket regulation affecting all migrant women. However, the Supreme Court approved the circular on a Rights Petition filed in 2013.

A report by UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants, Francois Crepeau, also highlighted the discriminatory nature of the regulation. In his report to the Government he described the regulation as a “discriminatory practice” which denied women opportunities.

Furthermore, a public interest litigation was filed last year by Priyadharshani Ariyarathna when the ministry amended the regulation to require a FBR on all female migrant workers. In the petition she highlighted that the regulation discriminates women and violates the rights of women based on their gender, age and marital status. Critics have highlighted that the FBR puts the sole responsibility of childcare on women, which places an unfair burden on them. 

 


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Our Cricket Board simply cannot deliver – why not they all quit honourably?

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

“It is necessary, therefore, for the Government to pay serious attention to the doings of Sri Lanka Cricket [board] and take immediate action to lift their game for the progress of our glorious game.” Question for Sri Lanka Cricket (board) Sri La


Yesterday Tamils, today Muslims and tomorrow who?

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

From the time of S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike’s election victory in 1956, one and only one issue had dominated political party campaigns in this country; and that was communalism. The Tamil community was the main focus of these campaigns for over 50 years


Those who go by social proof are easy prey to crafty schemers

Monday, 17 June 2019

Going after social proof Swiss writer and novelist, Rolf Dobelli, in one of the essays in his 2013 book ‘The Art of Thinking Clearly’, has given a fine warning to his readers. He has warned against going by ‘social proof’ or ‘majority view


Poson ponderings on positional power: ‘Authority vested’ vs. ‘authority wasted’

Monday, 17 June 2019

We witnessed a serene Poson Poya, in a far more improved security setting in Sri Lanka. Whilst the Sri Lankan life slowly returning to normal, political fronts do not appear to show the same. Has the political power become the people ‘pava’ (sin)


Columnists More