Home / CSR / Events/ The Mace: Not to be touched!

The Mace: Not to be touched!


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Saturday, 31 October 2015 00:00


Mace-in-Sri-Lankan-ParliamentMace in Sri Lankan Parliament

By D.C. Ranatunga

The recent action by a senior MP and former minister in removing the Mace during a heated Parliamentary session drew public attention since grabbing the mace is considered a ‘grave crime’ in parliamentary tradition.

There have not been many such instances in the Sri Lankan Parliament and each time it happens it becomes the talking point as a breach of parliamentary privilege. Why is it considered such a dishonourable act? Possibly because ‘Honourable Members of Parliament’ are expected to maintain dignity and decorum of the House and forcibly removing the mace is ‘not the done thing’, as we say in common parlance. 

The Mace is the symbol of authority of Parliament. For the business of the House to start the mace is ceremoniously brought in by the Sergeant-at-Arms, the custodian of the mace, carrying it on his right shoulder. He heads the Speaker’s procession. The Secretary-General of Parliament and the Deputy follow him with the Speaker in his official garb coming next. The Members stand and keep standing until the mace is placed on the desk below the Speaker’s chair and the Speaker himself bows and takes his seat. When the mace is removed by the Sergeant-at-Arms it symbolises that the sessions are over for the day.

The use of the mace started with the adoption of the Westminster model of parliamentary system of government recommended by the Soulbury Commission. Though the first Parliament met in September 1947, it was one year after Independence that the mace was introduced. It was a gift by the British House of Commons to the House of Representatives in 1949.

The beautifully-carved mace weighs 28 pounds and measures 48 inches in length. The staff is made of ebony and decorated with silver, 18-carat gold and sapphires. The design has been inspired by traditional Sri Lankan art. 

It has been described thus: “The base is composed of an inverted lotus in silver and gold and the first knop also includes the lotus together with two chased gold bands. Above that is a band of sapphires supporting a longer chased gold band, above which is an octagonal silver knop. This in turn supports four sections in silver and 18-carat gold still in lotus form, representing the four quarters of the earth, from which hang sapphire and gold drops. Above this is a cube on which are chased four emblems: the sun and the moon symbolic of Perpetuity, the Chakra – a symbol of Progress and a bowl of flowers (purna ghata) symbolic of Prosperity. Above this is the main feature of the mace, a sphere of silver on which is mounted two chased Sinhalese lions (sehala) with drawn sword. Above this sphere appears again the lotus, another band of sapphires and an octagonal polished crystal terminal, symbolic of purity.”

Although the mace has been in use after 1949, records refer to initial discussions to have a mace and to appoint a Sergeant-at-Arms being held in July 1931 during the first State Council set up following the recommendations of the Donoughmore Commission. A Committee comprising Speaker Sir Francis Molamure, Susantha de Fonseka, Major J.W. Oldfield, Dr. V.R. Shockman, D.D. Athulathmudali and G.N. Farquahr, Secretary to the State Council had discussed the issues. In March 1933, the State Council had considered the powers and functions of the Sergeant-at-Arms, his staff and other matters including the procedure that should be followed when admitting visitors to the galleries. 

However, it was not until the first Parliament was elected that these took effect. The first Sergeant-at-Arms, M. Ismail MBE was appointed in 1947 He held the post until 1961. He was succeeded by Ananda de Silva who was Assistant Sergeant-at-Arms.

I remember big, burly Ismail walking into the Chamber carrying the mace in the old Parliament (now the Presidential Secretariat) passing the press box which was in a corner alongside Opposition MPs. That was the era when we, as Parliamentary reporters, had to wear a tie and coat (there were no reporters wearing national dress) to report proceedings from the press box. Opposite us on the Government side was the Officials’ Box. They were often consulted by ministers in the front row whenever a bill relating to a particular ministry was being discussed. 

 

History of the mace

Following the British Parliament’s tradition, most Commonwealth countries use the mace as symbol of their parliaments. The identical procedure is followed in the use of the mace in all the countries.

As for the use of the mace, historians trace it to medieval times when the Royal Sergeants-at-Arms were distinguished by their power of arrest without a warrant. Their maces were originally ordinary weapons of war, similar to a club. Later they became their emblems of authority. They were stamped with the Royal Arms; and in an age in which few men could read or write, the Sergeants arrest people by showing their maces and not by producing any form of written warrant.

The ‘A-Z of British Parliament’ describes the mace as a silver ornament, about 1.5 meters long dating back to the time of Charles I and is placed on the large table in the centre of the House of Commons. It is a symbol of Royal authority. “Each day it is put on the table by the Sergeant of Arms, who is a kind of parliamentary policeman. Nobody, apart from the Sergeant, is allowed to touch it. But one infamous day in 1976, an MP called Michael Hesletine (whose nickname is Tarzan due to his long flowing hair) was so annoyed at the speeches being given by MPs that he picked up the mace and waved it around above his head. The Speaker immediately closed the session.”

Such incidents are obviously rare and have been recorded as follows: 

In 1653, during the Rump Parliament, Oliver Cromwell is said to have derided the Mace as a “Fools’ bauble” and ordered troops to “take it away.”

In 1930, John Beckett, a member of the Labour Party, was suspended from the House of Commons for showing disrespect to the Mace by trying to leave the chamber with it while protesting against the suspension of another member. It was wrestled away from him at the door.

In 1976, Michael Heseltine, a member of the Conservative Party, seized the mace and brandished it at the opposing Labour Party members, during a heated debate on the Aircraft and Shipbuilding Industries Bill. 

In 1987, Ron Brown, then Labour MP for Leith, picked up the mace during a debate on the poll tax, and threw it to the floor. The mace was damaged and Brown was ordered to pay £ 1,500 to repair it. When he latter failed to read out a pre-agreed apology to the Speaker, he was suspended from the Commons and the Labour Party.

In 2009, John McDonnell, the Labour MP for Hayes and Harlington, in which London Heathrow Airport is situated, was suspended from the Commons after disrupting a debate on expansion of the airport. Following Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon›s announcement that the government had decided to approve a new Heathrow runway without a vote in the Commons, McDonnell picked up the Commons mace. TV pictures of the Commons chamber were cut during McDonnell›s protest. McDonnell was named by Deputy Speaker Sir Alan Haselhurst and, as such, was suspended from the Commons for five days.

Mace-in-British-ParliamentMace in British Parliament


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

The Brahmin footprint in Sri Lankan history

Saturday, 17 November 2018

It is generally said that there are no genuine “Sri Lankan” Brahmins in the island today, and that those Brahmins who officiate as priests in Hindu kovils (temples) are of Indian origin with close ties with Tamil Nadu.


Country paying for Sirisena’s childlike behaviour

Saturday, 17 November 2018

Many were surprised on 26 October to see former President Rajapaksa being appointed Prime Minister by the very man who defeated him a couple years ago, at a considerable risk to himself and to those who helped him win the election. Then events beca


The JR-MR effect

Saturday, 17 November 2018

Sri Lanka over the last few weeks has experienced a twin crisis. One is political provoked by its Constitution, and the other economic engendered by its politics. However, this crisis is the combined effect of two previous presidencies, those of J.R.


The fish that swallowed the whale

Friday, 16 November 2018

This is an easy-peasy, elementary effort of an ordinary citizen to comprehend the mad scramble for power among the political class. It is undertaken in the belief that the crisis we face is an opportunity to reject the family kleptocracy of Mahinda R


Columnists More