Home / News/ MR to challenge PRECIFAC’s legality

MR to challenge PRECIFAC’s legality


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Monday, 19 October 2015 00:00


  • Team of lawyers exploring options of going before Court of Appeal
  • MR claims that commission is unconstitutional with serving High Court Judges
  • Weeratunga reveals MR instructed appointment of Siriwardena as ITN Chairman 

Untitled-2Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa

By Shanika Sriyananda

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa is likely to challenge the legality of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry to Investigate and Inquire into Serious Acts of Fraud, Corruption and Abuse of Power, State Resources and Privileges (PRECIFAC) in the Court of Appeal.

Sources close to Rajapaksa told the Daily FT that his team of lawyers was now looking into the possibility of going before the Court of Appeal against the PRECIFAC, which consists of four sitting High Court judges.

Rajapaksa’s lawyers, led by President’s Counsel Gamini Marapana, at the public hearing last week had  objected to the functioning of the PRECIFAC stating that the commission was unconstitutional as four serving High Court judges of the PRECIFAC could not be appointed to carry out other duties such as functioning as members of the commission.

The PRECIFAC public hearing was held last week over alleged financial losses caused to the State-run Independent Television Network (ITN) due to the failure to pay for advertisements broadcast during Rajapaksa’s 2015 presidential election campaign and also over the appointment of the ITN Chairman in September 2014.

However, the public hearing, which was postponed due to objections, was recommenced the following day with PRECIFAC Chairman High Court Judge Preethi Padman Surasena refuting objections.

He said that the commission could proceed with its sittings as it was a legally formed commission by the President.

“Under the Article 110 of the Sri Lankan Constitution, the President can appoint High Court judges for other duties. There is no mention in the Constitution that High Court judges cannot be appointed to the commission,” he said.

However, sources, confirming that there was a possibility to challenge the validity of the PRECIFAC before the Court of Appeal, told the Daily FT that Rajapaksa’s lawyers would soon decide when to file a case in the Court of Appeal.

“We may wait and see how the commission functions and will then decide,” he said. Meanwhile, Lalith Weeratunga, Rajapaksa’s Secretary, revealed at the PRECIFAC public hearing on Friday that he wrote to former Minister of Media Keheliya Rambukkwella to appoint Anura Siriwardena as Chairman of the ITN on former president Rajapaksa’s instructions.

Former Media Ministry Secretary, Charitha Herath, was also questioned over the appointment of ITN Chairman Siriwardena in September 2014 replacing then Chairman Rosmond Senaratne.


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

The Brahmin footprint in Sri Lankan history

Saturday, 17 November 2018

It is generally said that there are no genuine “Sri Lankan” Brahmins in the island today, and that those Brahmins who officiate as priests in Hindu kovils (temples) are of Indian origin with close ties with Tamil Nadu.


Country paying for Sirisena’s childlike behaviour

Saturday, 17 November 2018

Many were surprised on 26 October to see former President Rajapaksa being appointed Prime Minister by the very man who defeated him a couple years ago, at a considerable risk to himself and to those who helped him win the election. Then events beca


The JR-MR effect

Saturday, 17 November 2018

Sri Lanka over the last few weeks has experienced a twin crisis. One is political provoked by its Constitution, and the other economic engendered by its politics. However, this crisis is the combined effect of two previous presidencies, those of J.R.


The fish that swallowed the whale

Friday, 16 November 2018

This is an easy-peasy, elementary effort of an ordinary citizen to comprehend the mad scramble for power among the political class. It is undertaken in the belief that the crisis we face is an opportunity to reject the family kleptocracy of Mahinda R


Columnists More