Home / Opinion and Issues/ Statement by Sri Lankan civil society members on OHCHR reports on Sri Lanka

Statement by Sri Lankan civil society members on OHCHR reports on Sri Lanka

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Tuesday, 22 September 2015 00:01

We, the undersigned Sri Lankan civil society activists and organisations, welcome the report of the Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on Promoting Reconciliation, Accountability and Human Rights in Sri Lanka, and the report of the OHCHR Investigation on Sri Lanka (OISL). We fully endorse and call for the immediate implementation of the OISL’s recommendations to the GoSL, the UN system and the Member States of the UNHRC.

We also note the statement of Hon. Mangala Samaraweera, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Sri Lanka, at the General Debate of the 30th Session of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) on 14 September 2015. The Minister informed the Council that the Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL) ‘recognises that the process of reconciliation involves addressing the broad areas of truth seeking, justice, reparations and non-recurrence, and for non-recurrence to become truly meaningful, the necessity of reaching a political settlement.’


We welcome the numerous positive commitments by the Minister, such as to ‘review and repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA)’, criminalise hate speech and enforced disappearances, sign and ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearances (CED), and invite UN Special Rapporteurs to undertake visits to Sri Lanka in 2015. We welcome in particular the promise to publish previous commission reports such as the Udalagama and Paranagama Commission reports by the end of September 2015.

We acknowledge the Minister’s reference to those in ‘positions of responsibility’ and understand such reference to be an implicit commitment to ensure that decision-makers are held accountable for grave breaches of international law.

We wish to flag with deep concern the continuing violations of human rights that have occurred since January 2015. We are particularly concerned about the high prevalence of surveillance, harassment and intimidation of Tamil civilians, human rights defenders, journalists and civil society organisations, by members of the security forces and law enforcement authorities. In addition, a disturbing number of incidence of abduction, arrests, detention, sexual violence of women and children, attacks on religious groups, and torture, have been reported during this period.


Noting the absence of any acknowledgement of such continuing violations in the Minister’s statement on 14 September, we ask that the GoSL take immediate steps to end such ongoing violations and bring perpetrators—including members of the security forces and law enforcement officials—to justice. The absence of credible domestic investigations into allegations against the security forces and the recent promotions of military officials implicated in serious violations of international law are troubling indicators of the present government’s lack of political will to hold security forces accountable.

We appreciate the Foreign Minister’s acceptance of broken promises of the past, mistakes of the past and weaknesses of our institutions. We note his acknowledgement that the short-sighted and triumphalist policies since 2009 had been among reasons for post-war reconciliation being elusive. It is in this light that we endorse the OHCHR’s observations that ‘the past years have seen a total failure of domestic mechanisms to credibly investigate, establish the truth, ensure accountability and provide redress to victims of the serious human rights violations and abuses’ in Sri Lanka.


The present Government bears the burden of delivering on its promises and regaining the confidence of victims and survivors. In light of the Foreign Minister’s commitments not to cower behind distorted concepts and principles such as sovereignty, and to address weaknesses and deficiencies with the help of the international community, we call upon the GoSL to:

1.Commit to a political and constitutional settlement of the ethnic conflict based on meaningful power sharing.

2.Introduce domestic statutory reforms to incorporate international crimes such as war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, without statute of limitations.

3.Incorporate modes of liability with respect to international crimes such as command responsibility and joint and co-perpetration into domestic law.

4.Provide for the appointment of international judges, lawyers, prosecutors and investigators to a special hybrid court as recommended by the OISL Report. Moreover, facilitate the appointment of international experts to other transitional justice mechanisms, in full compliance with international standards and best practices.

5.Invite the OHCHR to establish a full-fledged country presence to monitor the human rights situation, advise on implementation of the High Commissioner’s recommendations, past HRC resolutions and recommendations of various UN bodies and provide technical assistance.

6.With support from the OHCHR, hold broad consultations with all relevant stakeholders, particularly survivors and their families, and civil society groups, including those from the North and East, with a strong commitment by the government to take on board sentiments expressed therein, prior to finalising any mechanisms.

7.Publish in full, by the end of September 2015, all reports of Commissions of Inquiry that have inquired into human rights violations in the past.

8.Initiate a high-level review of the PTA and its regulations and the Public Security Ordinance Act with a view to their repeal and the formulation of a new national security framework fully complying with international law.

9.Criminalise enforced disappearance through special legislation, and establish a permanent Office of Missing Persons with strong involvement of families of disappeared persons, civil society, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the international community.

10.Sign and ratify the CED including recognition of article 31, Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture (OPCAT), the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and also extend standing invitations to all Special Procedures of the HRC.

11.Guarantee protection to witnesses and victims of crimes, including international crimes, in keeping with international standards and best practices.

12.Formulate a plan to ensure adequate reparations to victims in keeping with international standards and best practices.

13.Enact, with immediate effect a law on the Right to Information.

14.Establish a special mechanism to fast-track and bring to justice all perpetrators of sexual violence against women and children.


We call upon the Member States of the HRC to ensure that the consensus resolution on Sri Lanka to be adopted at the present Council session endorses the positive commitments of the government, findings and recommendations of the OHCHR reports, and our above calls. We also call upon the Member States to ensure that the resolution mandates the OHCHR to keep the Council informed of progress made by all parties in implementing the recommendations of the OHCHR reports, by reporting back at regular cycles within a two year period.




1.Ameer Faaiz – Attorney-at-law

2.B. Gowthaman – Attorney-at-law

3.Balasingham Skanthakumar

4.Bhavani Fonseka – Attorney-at-law

5.Bishop Kumara Illangasinghe

6.Brito Fernando

7.Chandraguptha Thenuwara


9.Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu

10.Faizun Zackariya

11.Gehan Gunatilleke

12.Hans Billimoria

13.Hasanah Cegu Isadeen

14.Herman Kumara

15.Hilmy Ahamed

16.K. Aingkaran – Attorney-at-law

17.Kusal Perera – Journalist

18.Marisa de Silva

19.Mohammed Mahuruf

20.Mujeebur Rahman – Media person, Mannar

21.Nalini Ratnarajah – Woman Human Rights Defender

22.Navaranjini Nadarajah – Sureka

23.Nilshan Fonseka

24.Nimalka Fernando

25.Niran Anketell – Attorney-at-law

26.Priya Thangarajah

27.Rev. Fr. J. Raj Claier

28.Rev. Fr. Nandana Manatunga

29.Rev. Fr. V. Yogeswaran

30.Rev. Sr. Beatrice Fernando, SDS

31.Rev. Sr. Nichola Emmanuel

32.Rosanna Flamer-Caldera

33.Ruki Fernando

34.Sampath Samarakoon

35.Sheila Richards

36.Shreen Abdul Saroor

37.Sudarshana Gunawardana

38.Udaya Kalupathirana

39.Vasuki Jeyasankar


40.Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA)

41.Centre for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights (CPPHR), Trincomalee

42.Citizens Voice for Justice and Peace

43.Equal Ground

44.Families of the Disappeared (FoD)


46.Human Rights Office, Kandy

47.INFORM Human Rights Documentation Centre

48.National Fisheries Solidarity Movement (NAFSO)

49.Right to Life (R2L) – Human Rights Centre

50.Rights Now Collective for Democracy

51.Rural Development Foundation

52.South Asian Center for Legal Studies (SACLS)

53.Women’s Action Network (WAN)

Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

Building your own personal brand

Monday, 9 December 2019

Sunil Gavaskar is one of India’s greatest batsman. But he also has a very unique sense of humour. And he used that tongue-in-cheek humour to make a point at a press conference. This was a time when the Indian cricket team was touring abroad and the

Tax cuts: Control the damage before the unconventional stimulus backfires

Monday, 9 December 2019

Damage control exercise by Finance Ministry In a background of some contrasting signals from various parties regarding the generous tax cuts introduced by the Government, the Finance Ministry has attempted to do a damage control exercise by issuing a

Peace, business and prosperity

Saturday, 7 December 2019

Every nation, every community and each individual is facing the social and political impact along with the impact of violence. Interpersonal violence results in medical, policing and judicial costs immediately after the violent incident occurs and it

‘Data is the new oil’: An introduction to the proposed Data Protection Act

Friday, 6 December 2019

Data protection is not a concept we, in Sri Lanka, are familiar with. Globally, the laws surrounding data protection have been around for about 20 years. And we are only just about getting started. The proposed ‘Data Protection Act’ (hereinafter

Columnists More