Home / News/ SLPP unhappy over President seeking SC clarification

SLPP unhappy over President seeking SC clarification


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Thursday, 11 April 2019 00:00

Facebook

 


 

  • Says seeking SC opinion a ploy to delay elections
  • G.L. threatens to go before courts to counter any effort to postpone polls  
  • SLPP unhappy over SLFP decision to abstain from Budget vote 
  • Insists SLFP explanation inadequate, wants stronger effort to build coalition 

By Nuwan Senarathna 

The Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) yesterday criticised the possibility of President Maithripala Sirisena seeking the Supreme Court’s opinion on the length of his term, as a step that would delay elections indicating talks between the SLPP and Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) to form a coalition were not proceeding smoothly.

SLPP faction member Dullas Alahapperuma expressed his displeasure on the SLFP’s statement on seeking the opinion of the Supreme Court while talking to media after the third round of talks with the SLFP on a possible collation to face upcoming elections. 

MP Dullas Alahapperuma



“This is a misleading statement. If this is done it could lead to a postponement of elections. We do not want any delays we want polls to be held on time,” he told reporters at the Opposition Leaders office yesterday. SLPP Chairman Prof. G.L. Peiris also said he too would go before court if any party tries to delay the Presidential Election. “It is a violation of our democratic rights, therefore we will not hesitate to take legal actions against those who try to delay any election,” he said.  

The latest round of talks between the SLFP and SLPP on the proposed political alliance against the United National Party (UNP) ended with mixed results, with both parties expressing contradictory views on recent political developments. The SLPP was also critical of the SLFP’s decision to abstain during the Budget vote on 5 April.    

Speaking to reporters, Prof. Peiris expressed his displeasure over the SLFP’s decision and questioned their intention of forming an alliance against the UNP. He noted SLPF’s behaviour during the Budget vote had dented the trust between the two parties. 

“SLFP’s decision indirectly supported the UNP and its Budget,” he charged. 

Prof. Peiris said members of SLPP had questioned the possibility and practicality of forming a political alliance with a political party that chose to be absent during the final vote on the Budget.  “Following the second reading of the Budget, the SLFP agreed to vote against it in the final vote but they failed to deliver on this promise. Therefore we told them such contradictory steps is not good for the progress of the discussion,” he added.  However, MP Thilanga Sumathipala justified SLFP’s decision to abstain from voting as the Budget included expenditure heads for the President. “How can the SLFP vote against its own President and the chairman of the party? We were in a situation where we could not vote in favour of UNP nor could we vote against the President,” he added. 

The discussion commenced at the Opposition Leader’s Office with the participation of representatives of both parties. The discussion was held for more than one hour, with the next meeting to be on 9 May. 

SLFP General Secretary MP Dayasiri Jayasekara, Prof. Rohana Lakshman Piyadasa, and MP Thilanga Sumathipala represented the SLFP camp. Prof. Peiris, Senior Lecturer Jagath Wellawatte, and Joint Opposition (JO) National Organiser MP Dullas Alahapperuma represented the SLPP camp. Following the discussion, MP Jayasekara told media the talks ended on a positive note, as both parties were able to find common ground to formulate policies that they could agree upon. “We will inform outcomes of this discussion to the central committee and SLPP will to the same. Once we get the approval we will be able to provide that information to media and the public,” he added.

He noted a separate discussion would be held with leaders of both parties parallel to the current talks. He pointed out the new set of decisions would be held within the next few weeks to analyse recent political developments.


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Whither Sri Lanka?

Wednesday, 19 June 2019

On Easter Sunday, 21 April 2019, suicide bombers from an extremist group caused carnage in six separate locations in Sri Lanka. Over 250 lives were lost and as many injured. The magnitude and co-ordination of their operation indicate several months o


Our Cricket Board simply cannot deliver – why not they all quit honourably?

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

“It is necessary, therefore, for the Government to pay serious attention to the doings of Sri Lanka Cricket [board] and take immediate action to lift their game for the progress of our glorious game.” Question for Sri Lanka Cricket (board) Sri La


Yesterday Tamils, today Muslims and tomorrow who?

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

From the time of S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike’s election victory in 1956, one and only one issue had dominated political party campaigns in this country; and that was communalism. The Tamil community was the main focus of these campaigns for over 50 years


Those who go by social proof are easy prey to crafty schemers

Monday, 17 June 2019

Going after social proof Swiss writer and novelist, Rolf Dobelli, in one of the essays in his 2013 book ‘The Art of Thinking Clearly’, has given a fine warning to his readers. He has warned against going by ‘social proof’ or ‘majority view


Columnists More