Home / News/ AG challenges acquittal of Gnanasara; CA fixes Argument on 23 November

AG challenges acquittal of Gnanasara; CA fixes Argument on 23 November


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Thursday, 14 June 2018 00:10


By S. S. Selvanayagam

Court of Appeal yesterday fixed for Argument on 23  November the appeal filed by the Attorney General against the High Court Judgment, wherein Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero and two Buddhist monks, as well as 10 other laymen, were acquitted on the indictment against them for the alleged attack on the Calvary Church at Araliya Uyana in Talahena.

The Bench comprised Justices Deepali Wijesundera and Achala Wengappuli.

The Court of Appeal, on 2 February, directed the Counsel for the Accused-Respondent Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero to file Written Submission on 23 May, in respect of the Appeal filed by the Attorney General against the judgment of the Colombo High Court, which acquitted Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero and two Buddhist monks, as well as 10 other laymen, who had been indicted for the alleged attack on the Calvary Church at Araliya Uyana in Talahena.

The Attorney General cited S. A. Athula Seneviratne, W. M. Sudu Banda, H. Thamara Beatrice, A. K. Denzil Premakumara Perera, D. S. P. Kandana Arachchi, T. K. Somadasa, E. M. Victor Ratnayake, K.W. Karunananda, E. M. H. Ratnayake, Aththaragama Gnanawimala Himi, Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Himi, Angulagalle Siri Jinananda Himi and Dhanuska Sanjeeva as Accused-Respondents.

The Accused-Respondents had been indicted in the Colombo High Court for having committed offences of being members of an unlawful assembly to attack the said Calvary Church; for causing mischief to the said Church and causing injuries to Sydney Roshan Anderson and John Anton Anderson, as well as for robbery of two gold chains.

The High Court, in its judgment on 02.04.2014, acquitted all the accused. The Attorney General, in his appeal against the Judgment of the High Court, is seeking the Court of Appeal to set aside the judgment of the High Court, and convict and sentence the accused according to law, and make order substituting the order quashed.

Manohara de Silva PC appeared for Ven. Gnanasara Thero. State Counsel Himali Jayanetti appeared for the Attorney General. U. R. de Silva, Kalyana Tiranagama and Sandamalee Ekanayake appeared for 10 Respondents.


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

DMK Chief “Kalaignar” Karunanidhi excelled as a Tamil film script writer

Saturday, 18 August 2018

Muttuvel Karunanidhi, known to the Tamil-speaking world as “Kalaignar” (artiste), passed away at the age of 94 in Chennai on 7 August. Karunanidhi had been Chief Minister of India’s Tamil Nadu state for a total of 19 years. He was Chief Ministe


Bangladesh could be a happy hunting ground for Lankan entrepreneurs

Saturday, 18 August 2018

Bangladesh has traditionally been hospitable to Sri Lankan entrepreneurs and fortunately, the traditional friendliness has not given way to arrogance with the country’s growing prosperity. This was acknowledged at a meeting of Sri Lankan entreprene


Warriors who fight for a larger purpose

Friday, 17 August 2018

Are women more naturally inclined to cooperation than men? Sulochana Sigera’s impassioned statement at last week’s Women in Management Awards seemed to suggest so. Addressing the under-representation of women decision-makers, Sigera pointed to th


Do we sink or swim? No Michael, row the boat ashore!

Friday, 17 August 2018

Why Sri Lanka needs to strengthen geopolitical ties to be a competitive global economy by 2030


Columnists More