Home / Front Page/ CB disputes ratings agency decision

CB disputes ratings agency decision


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Wednesday, 5 December 2018 00:00


 


 

  • Insists no slippage in macroeconomic policies or fundamentals 
  • Argues making decision only based on political turmoil is unjustified 
  • Recaps provisions made to meet debt payments  

The Central Bank yesterday said it disagreed with the decisions by Fitch Ratings and other agencies to downgrade Sri Lanka’s Long-Term Rating from ‘B+’ (Stable) to ‘B’ (Stable), which the monetary authority insisted were based on “uncorroborated facts” of the country’s macroeconomic fundamentals.

In spite of the recent developments in the country’s political sphere, an array of measures have been taken by the Central Bank and the Government to minimise any potential impact from the recent political developments on the economy, especially with regard to external financing requirements and debt payment obligations, a statement by the Central Bank said yesterday. 

In meeting the Government’s external liabilities of International Sovereign Bond (ISB) maturities of $ 1 billion in January 2019 and $ 500 million in April 2019, the authorities have already built a buffer fund from proceeds of non-strategic asset divestment and recently contracted a Syndicated loan, in addition to the space provided under the Active Liability Management (ALM) initiative not exceeding a limit of Rs. 310 billion. 

The issuance of Sri Lanka Development Bonds (SLDBs) of around $ 750 million to $ 1 billion during the remainder of the year and in early 2019 sourced through enhanced credit lines for state banks from the Middle East and East Asia is nearing completion. 

Further, the enhancement of $ 500 million to the syndicated loan arrangement by February 2019 is also in progress. In addition, further support could be expected from the proceeds of about $ 600 million expected as disbursements from bilateral and multilateral agencies during next year. These proceeds, together with the available funds, would more than cover all the ISB payments due in 2019.

“Meanwhile, with the aim of further strengthening the reserve adequacy, the Central Bank has initiated negotiations with central banks and regional funds such as SAARC Swap Framework to obtain foreign currency SWAP facilities. These measures would not only further strengthen the country’s foreign reserve adequacy, they would also enable timely servicing of external obligations while providing the space for intervening cautiously in the foreign exchange market to prevent excessive volatility. It is noteworthy that there has been a favourable adjustment in the exchange rate during recent days supported by rising foreign currency inflows which would be further enhanced in the upcoming holiday and new year season,” the statement said. 

In addition, the fiscal and macro prudential measures that are already in place are expected to result in an improvement in the external trade balance as well, thus reducing pressure on external reserves and the exchange rate. 

Meanwhile, domestic financing conditions have shown considerable improvement through spaces created and debt management strategies introduced recently. This has reduced the rollover requirement of Treasury bonds and SLDBs in 2019, 2020 and in the medium term.

Notably, the new acquisition of government securities by the banking sector has increased by only 1.5% in 2018 as against the trend increase of around 5% in recent years. It needs to be further reiterated that Sri Lanka’s banking and financial sector remains resilient to both domestic and external vulnerabilities. Even though the operating environment is challenging, the banking sector is subject to a stringent supervisory and regulatory framework, it added.  

The commitment of the banking sector to adhere to higher levels of capital and liquidity requirements demonstrates its resilience in facing these challenges, thereby creating a stable outlook for the banking sector.

“Given these parameters, the Central Bank is of the view that the recent rating actions by Fitch Ratings and S&P Global Ratings are unwarranted. Such an action only on the premise of heightened political uncertainty, with no evidence of slippages in macroeconomic policies or fundamentals, cannot be justified. The soundness of the underlying macroeconomic conditions was reinforced by the fact that a staff-level agreement in principle was reached with the IMF (26 October 2018) on the fifth review of the Extended Fund Facility (EFF).” 

 


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Unless addressed, wages issue will keep troubling Bangladesh’s garment industry

Saturday, 19 January 2019

The recent week-long mass protests by garment workers in Bangladesh came to an end after an upward revision of wages for six classes of workers. But even after the upward revision, the Bangladeshi garment worker gets less than what workers in compara


Is GDP the ideal metric of the future?

Friday, 18 January 2019

In an age of stark contradictions, we live in a world where the exclusive 1% enjoy access to an abundance of wealth and resources but also a world where a billion people scarcely have enough to eat and have limited access to health and education. Whi


Evaluation of economic performance: 4 years into Yahapalana Government

Friday, 18 January 2019

The Yahapalana Government completed four years on 8 January this year. The four-year journey was a rough ride with a clear rift between the President and the UNP; the ruling party. The Government continues to face severe criticism from both inside an


Elimination of bribery and corruption

Friday, 18 January 2019

Bribery and corruption can be regarded as a malicious cancer that has penetrated into almost every strata of Sri Lankan state. It can be considered a major factor affecting Sri Lanka’s poverty, backwardness and indebtedness. Abuse of power by thos


Columnists More