Home / Columnists/ BOI needs to become more competitive

BOI needs to become more competitive


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Friday, 28 October 2016 00:01


 untitled-8

Last week at an economic forum it was mentioned that while Sri Lanka attracted $ 700 million in FDI, Singapore got $ 40 billion and Ireland got $ 30 billion and the low level of Foreign Direct Investment was becoming a serious constraint to sustained rapid economic development. 

Moreover it was highlighted that it is not only the amount of Foreign Direct Investment that matters but the types of Foreign Direct Investment. The country has been unable to attract the kinds of investments that would have multiplier benefits to the economy from increased exports and transfer of technology. The drop in export income also reflects this trend.

Foreign investment is a significant driver of economic development. FDI fills the savings-investment gap and enhances investment and economic growth. FDI contributes to improving work ethics, discipline, skills and knowledge of workers. It is an important means of technology transfer and transmission of best practices in management and often brings with them international markets. 

It is the realisation of these economic benefits that has made former communist countries like China and Vietnam, and the formerly inward looking Indian economy to actively seek foreign investment. In 2015, for example, China attracted around $ 60 billion India untitled-4around $ 63 billion and Vietnam around $ 23 billion.

Policy reforms

Despite policy reforms towards private sector development, the private sector investment is constrained by several factors which need urgent corrective action by strengthening institutional set up. If Sri Lanka is to achieve 6% growth, foreign investment has to be increased to around 30% of GDP.

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) generally refers to long-term participation by one country in another country. It usually involves participation in a JV, capital transfer, transfer of technology and expertise. 

There are two types of FDI: inward Foreign Direct Investment and outward Foreign Direct Investment, resulting in a net FDI inflow (positive or negative) and stock of Foreign Direct Investment. There is substantial evidence that such investments benefit host countries.

In Sri Lanka, during periods of relative economic and political stability, Foreign Direct Investment inflows have responded positively. Sri Lanka expects Foreign Direct Investment to more than quadruple to $4 billion by 2020. FDI generally benefits the host country, however its potential impact should be carefully and practically accessed. 

FDI is viewed as the “good cholesterol” HDL, whereas international debt flow of short-term varieties are considered “bad cholesterol” LDL. FDI is thought to be “bolted down and cannot leave so easily at the first sign of trouble”. Unlike short-term debt, direct investments in a country are straight away reprised in the event of a crisis. 

Foreign Direct Investment has been proven to many to be resilient during a financial crisis. A good example would be the Mexican crisis that took place during 1994-1995 and the Latino crisis in the 1980s. The resilient of Foreign Direct Investment during a financial crisis can lead to many developing countries to monitor it as private capital inflow of choice, rather than investing in other forms of private capital such as portfolio equity, debt flows, and in particular, short-term flows which were all subjected to large reversals during the same period. 

Generally, private capital flows across borders, because it allows capital to seek out the highest rate of return. Countries often choose to exempt some of its revenue when they cut corporate tax rates in an attempt to attract FDI from other countries. FDI also allows the transfer of expertise and technology, particularly in the form of varieties of capital inputs, which cannot be got via financial investments or trade in goods and services. 

However, there are many findings that show FDI is a relatively bigger portion of total inward investment in some countries, where the risks are very high. This is often because FDI tends to take advantage of the countries where the market is inefficient. It happens because of foreign investors prefer more to operate directly instead of relying on local financial markets, supplies, or legal arrangements. In high-risk countries, the share of total inflows is higher and the risk is measured by the countries credit ratings.

Attracting FDI

The best solution for developing countries to increase their overall amount of inward investment of all kind, is to focus on concentrating on improving the environment for investment, the functioning of capital markets and private companies need to improve governance within their enterprises, skills level, internationalise and work towards becoming multinational enterprises.

By doing so, they are likely to be rewarded with increased investment as well as with more capital inflows. Given the very low returns in the West. 

There is a clear shift of focus to frontier and emerging markets since they remain the only source of growth in the world economy. Given the limitation of our market, Sri Lanka could very well attract more foreign investment, and develop faster, if we improve our infrastructure, workforce skills, have policy consistency, efficient capital markets, provide sustainable legal guarantees to protect investment and strengthen governance in both the public and private sectors. 

The BOI also needs to develop a competitive value proposition that can compete with the likes of EDB Singapore, IDA Ireland, MIDA Malaysia and Sharjah Investment and Development Authority to position Sri Lanka for the future.

(The writer is a thought leader.)


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

The Brahmin footprint in Sri Lankan history

Saturday, 17 November 2018

It is generally said that there are no genuine “Sri Lankan” Brahmins in the island today, and that those Brahmins who officiate as priests in Hindu kovils (temples) are of Indian origin with close ties with Tamil Nadu.


Country paying for Sirisena’s childlike behaviour

Saturday, 17 November 2018

Many were surprised on 26 October to see former President Rajapaksa being appointed Prime Minister by the very man who defeated him a couple years ago, at a considerable risk to himself and to those who helped him win the election. Then events beca


The JR-MR effect

Saturday, 17 November 2018

Sri Lanka over the last few weeks has experienced a twin crisis. One is political provoked by its Constitution, and the other economic engendered by its politics. However, this crisis is the combined effect of two previous presidencies, those of J.R.


The fish that swallowed the whale

Friday, 16 November 2018

This is an easy-peasy, elementary effort of an ordinary citizen to comprehend the mad scramble for power among the political class. It is undertaken in the belief that the crisis we face is an opportunity to reject the family kleptocracy of Mahinda R


Columnists More