Home / News / Jaffna district MP Raviraj Murder Appeal against HC order acquitting Navy officers

Jaffna district MP Raviraj Murder Appeal against HC order acquitting Navy officers


Comments / 998 Views / Saturday, 20 May 2017 00:26


By S. S. Selvanayagam

The Court of Appeal yesterday (19) fixed to be taken up on 30 June the appeal filed by the widow of assassinated Tamil National Alliance (TNA) MP Nadarajah Raviraj against the order by the Colombo High Court in Raviraj’s murder case.

 The Bench comprised Justices Deepali Wijesundera and Lalith Jayasuriya.

 Appellant Sasikala Raviraj sought the Court of Appeal to set aside the High Court’s verdict of acquittal of the accused.

 Filing her appeal, Raviraj stated that the High Court judge had directed that the trial be attended by a special jury in line of charges relating to the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) and the Judge’s charge to the jury.

 Her husband was an elected MP from Jaffna district representing the TNA constituent party Ilankai Thamil Arasu Kadchi when he was assassinated on 10th November 2006.

 Raviraj further said that as borne out by the proceedings, when the case was taken up prior to trial, the Counsel for the second to fourth accused made application for the trial by a Sinhala speaking jury.

 The indictment included charges relating to offences specified in the PTA, she said, adding that Counsel for the aggrieved party objected to the said application.

 Raviraj’s counsel had objected to a jury trial on her instructions on the basis that the PTA is, in the circumstances, ‘lex specialis’ (law governing a specific subject matter) and by virtue of the PTA as well as the maxim ‘generalia specialis non derogant’ (the provisions of a general statute must yield to those of a special one - also known as the rule of implied exception) which has been consistently applied by Sri Lankan courts.

 She underlined that it is the procedure specified by the PTA which would override any other procedure stipulated by the regular Criminal Code. In this case, that requires that the trial by a Judge without a jury as specified in PTA.

The High Court judge made order on 27 October 2016 overruling the appellant’s objection and allowing a trial by a special jury, she stated.

 On 23 December 2016, after addresses to the jury by the Attorney General, Counsel for the aggrieved party, Counsel for the accused and the Attorney General, the High Court judge charged the jury in terms of Code of Criminal Procedure, she further said.

 In the course of this charge, he ordered the jury to provide a verdict in respect of all charges in the indictment, including those relating to the PTA, she added.

 After the jury’s deliberations, on 24 December 2016, the jury returned a verdict of not guilty in respect of the all accused for all charges in the indictment – after which the Judge discharged the accused.

 She contends the evidence presented against all accused at the trial was sufficient to convict them of all offences.

 She is seeking the Court of Appeal to set aside the order of the High Court judge and the verdict of the acquittal.

 She is asking the Court to find the accused guilty of all charges and to order a re-trial of the accused for all or several of the offences.

 Appellant cited Palani Sami Suresh, Chandana Kumara, Gamini Seneviratne, Pradeep Chaminda, Sivakanthan Vivekananthan and Fabian Roiston Tusen as Accused-Respondents as well as the Attorney General in her appeal.

M. A. Sumanthiran with Niran Anketell instructed by Moahan Balendra appeared for the Appellant.

Anuja Premaratne appeared for the acquitted Accused-Respondent Navy Officers Gamini Seneviratne and Pradeep Chaminda. Deputy Solicitor General Rohantha Abeysuriya appeared for the Attorney General.


Share This Article


COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Why do agricultural value chains fail? Part (VII): Unforeseen institutional decisions

26 July 2017

Introduction Institutions are an integral part of value chains. Government institutes drive agricultural advisory services in most value chains. Advisory services can come from the Department of Agriculture, which is attached to the Centra...


Money laundering: Should the Inland Revenue Department play a greater role?

26 July 2017

Money laundering is presently a very timely topic, locally and internationally. A perpetrator of the offence of money laundering could be defined as:  (1) Any person, who— (a) engages directly or indirectly in any transaction in relat...


Apannaka Jathaka: Shedding light on modern strategy and management practices

26 July 2017

We are a nation that has forgotten many of our own infinite treasures passed on generation after generation by our forefathers. ‘Jathaka Katha,’ the stories of previous lives of the Buddha or stories of Bodhisattva which had been widel...


Falling in love with your strategies could be fatal

26 July 2017

Strategy is significantly influenced and shaped by the opportunities and challenges in the business environment. Therefore, strategising has to be a dynamic process, which means strategies must be open to change. When ego and emotions start to ...


Columnists More