Comments /948 Views / Monday, 24 March 2014 00:39
FMC imposes reporting requirements on ‘Unique’ P3 agreementThe Global Shippers Forum (GSF) has extended its thanks to the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) for its thoughtful examination into the P3 Global Alliance Agreement in accordance with its remit under the US Shipping Act of 1984 and the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998. GSF stated that the US regulatory framework provides anti-trust immunity for ocean liner carriers to discuss prices, costs, and capacity arrangements in a regulated environment under agreements filed with the FMC. GSF Secretary General Chris Welsh said: “GSF members understand and appreciate the benefits that can flow from vessel sharing agreements. In light of this, we warmly welcome the fact that the FMC has listened to the GSF and taken on board our specific concerns regarding the potential for unreasonable costs or rate rises. We also welcome the fact that the FMC is to implement alternative reporting requirements in its ‘on-going close monitoring of the Agreement’.” In November 2013, the GSF summarised the concerns of many shippers by requesting the FMC fully examine the potential impact of the P3 on prices, services and service quality to ensure that the unprecedented market power of the P3 did not afford the parties the opportunity to impose unreasonable increases in transportation costs or unreasonable reductions in transportation services impacting shippers. On 5 December, 2013 the FMC slowed implementation of the P3 Alliance Agreement pending further analysis based on questions raised by the GSF and other shipper interests. Welsh added: “GSF further appreciates that the ‘new reporting requirements’ have been specifically tailored to the P3’s ‘unique authority’ to ensure that relevant information is provided to ensure that the FMC can act quickly in the event of abuses or unreasonable increases in transportation rates and costs or reductions in transportation services.” The GSF said that it was appreciative of the thorough analysis undertaken by the FMC. In particular, GSF has warmly welcomed the institution of specific monitoring program to ensure that the P3 parties “play by the rules”. We also welcome the safeguards drafted into the P3 agreement to ensure that the P3 Parties negotiate independently and enter into separate contracts with third parties. Welsh stated: “This is exactly what the GSF sought under the FMC’s regulatory authority. We will offer our observations to the FMC to discuss the arrangements over the implementation of monitoring arrangements and how GSF can assist this on-going process.” Attention now turns to Brussels where the GSF has recently submitted a new legal brief, framed by the EU’s guidelines on competition. Welsh concluded: “The GSF is similarly hopeful that the European competition authorities will fully examine the P3 under the EU competition guidelines and makes appropriate changes to the P3 as required by EU law.”
24 June 2017
Politics as the science of attaining “power” The first lessons taught to any student of the science of politics almost invariably includes a reference to the 16th century Florentine philosopher Machiavell...
24 June 2017
“I think that hate is a feeling that can only exist where there is no understanding” – Tennessee Williams, Sweet Bird of Youth A few days ago we had the Ven. Warakagoda Shri Gnanarathana, Mah...
24 June 2017
For the first time in the history of Indian presidential elections, caste has been brought to the fore in the run up to the 17 July presidential poll, reflecting the nature of politics in the country now. Both the ruling National Democrati...
23 June 2017
I was very hopeful when circumstances necessitated a national government of sorts in a hazy summer concatenation now long forgotten. At the time, we all thought the union of two major mainstream mindsets would result in a smorgasbord of good thing...
Yes or no to Paris Accord; let us reassess climate change
Faster, clearer data on disasters might help shield women and children
Bridging the skill gap: A challenge in Sri Lanka’s quest for economic growth
Professional way of dealing with damaging public protests to speed up economic development