Home / / Atlas Paint and Coatings enjoined from using Atlas metal filler trademark

Atlas Paint and Coatings enjoined from using Atlas metal filler trademark


Comments / 1011 Views / Thursday, 15 November 2012 00:00


By T. Farook Thajudeen

 Colombo Commercial High Court enjoined Atlas Paint and Coatings (Pvt.) Limited of Grandpass Road, Colombo 14 from distributing products to the market which holds a similar symbol owned by the plaintiff, Eadrien Joseph Croos Machado of Thimbirigasyaya, Colombo 5.

Commercial High Court Judge E. A .G. R. Amarasekera made this order on the defendant on considering the documents filed in court and the submissions of Senior Counsel Ian J. F. Fernando who appeared with Saman Liyanage as instructed by S. Bagirathan on behalf of the plaintiff.

The counsel said that despite notification to the defendant on 18 October 2012 by the plaintiff’s lawyer Derric Fernando, asking the plaintiff to not to use the symbol, and the paper publication on 3 November 2012  in the Ceylon Daily News, the symbol of the plaintiff had been used by Atlas Coating (Pvt.) Limited  and was distributed to the market.

The Counsel submitted that his client is the owner of the trademarks registered under numbers 150368, 15386 and 150387 and is called ‘Atlas Metal Filler,’ ‘Atlas Super Cut’ and ‘EZ Cut.’ Fernando said that the defendant was distributing products that are similar in appearance, thus causing an irreparable loss to the plaintiff if the defendant was not enjoined by the court.  

He contended that his client, by agreement No. 4086 attested by Notary Public S. Bagirathan on 5 October2012, had given the right to Buddhika Brushes (Pvt.) Ltd., Panagoda to use the symbols. However, the defendant had directly or indirectly infringed the rights of the plaint by using the words ‘instant repair paste for vehicles’ body work’ and the words ‘light weight metal filler,’ which are similar in appearance to the two products. The getup of the two labels is similar in colour, thus misleading the public, said the Counsel

He also contended that there has been a good demand for his products in the market for over 45 years and if the action of the defendant is not restrained from the first instance, an irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff.

The judge, on considering the submissions, issued an enjoining order stating that in terms of Para (c) of the plaint, that the defendant is enjoined from distributing products to the market which hold similar symbols owned by the plaintiff. The judge also issued notice of interim injunction returnable on 28 November. 


Share This Article


COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

SL can’t sit on the sidelines; we must join the race for trade and jobs

29 July 2016

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe speaking recently in Singapore     The Prime Minister’s move to fast-track the FTAs with Singapore and China and a revised ETCA is a good move. He knows we cannot...


Jaffna University – When entitlement is rejected

29 July 2016

On 16 July, a clash happened between students at Jaffna University over the inclusion of Sinhalese cultural spectacles in the welcome event. Below is a brief of the events but a more in-depth report of the goings-on can be found on DBS Jeyaraj&rsq...


The New Republic: Making it or Faking it?

29 July 2016

A week and more ago, those of us who remembered celebrated humanity’s greatest adventure yet: our first (manned spacecraft) moon landing on 20 July 1969. And yet a significant segment of web-crawlers still believes that the whole operation w...


The Development (Special Provisions) Bill and the Coalition Government

28 July 2016

“The proposal made by Hon. Prime Minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe, in his capacity as the Minister of National Policies and Economic Affairs, to publish the Sri Lanka Sustainable Development Bill in a gazette and present the same in Parliament...


Columnists More