Home / / Battle of biscuits: Maliban agrees to change packaging after Munchee sues

Battle of biscuits: Maliban agrees to change packaging after Munchee sues


Comments / 2838 Views / Wednesday, 12 September 2012 01:03


By S.S. Selvanayagam

The legal battle between Ceylon Biscuits Ltd, the manufacturer of the ‘Munchee’ brand of biscuits, and biscuit titan Maliban Biscuit Manufactories Ltd. has been amicably settled.          

The settlement was arrived at as the Defendant Maliban Biscuit Manufactories agreed to change its trade dress, which the Plaintiff Ceylon Biscuits Ltd. alleged had been its trade dress for ‘Munchee Hawaian Cookies’ and ‘Munchee Lite Marie’ products.

The Plaintiff filed legal action under the Intellectual Property Act against the Defendant, alleging infringement of its trade dress. It claimed that consumers easily identify its original eye-catching packaging, good quality and product innovation developed over the years of business.

The Defendant Maliban biscuits, the oldest biscuit manufacturer, recently introduced its own coconut biscuit under the name ‘Maliban Hawaiian Cookies’ and ‘Maliban Light Marie’.

The Plaintiff claimed that the abovementioned both biscuits not only have similar names as its well-established Munchee counterpart, but also utilise confusingly similar colour schemes and packaging, thus making it very difficult to distinguish between the two brands.

Aggrieved with the alleged encroachment into its business interests, the Plaintiff Ceylon Biscuits Ltd. filed action against the Defendant for the alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition under the Intellectual Property Act.

While the order of the High Court Judge P.W.D.C. Jayathilake was due, the Defendant agreed to change its packaging designs and entered into an agreement settlement.

Under the settlement, the Defendant undertook not to manufacture, pack, advertise, distribute, sell and/or release into circulation its brand of ‘Hawaiian Cookies’ and ‘Light Marie’ biscuits in the alleged packaging.

Manoj Bandara instructed by Sudath Perera Associates appeared for the Plaintiff. Dr. Asanga Gunawansa with Dilshan Jayasuriya and Hiran Jayasuriya instructed by Dissanayake Amaratunga Associates appeared for the Defendant.


Share This Article


COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Parsimony in Constitution making

12 February 2016

In the context of a debate I am involved in regarding the inclusion of access to technology and the Internet in particular in the Constitution, I was asked what I believed should be included in, and excluded from, a Constitution.This is an answer ...


Ideas for Western region Megapolis Master Plan

12 February 2016

At present, the public is minimally informed as to what Megapolis development is all about and has many questions regarding the concept of the Megapolis. Therefore, the Megapolis Ministry should further educate the public as to how it will affect ...


Good government requires leaders to put public good above their personal interests

12 February 2016

Lee Kuan Yew, the man behind modern Singapore, died at the age of 91, and while many Singaporeans are still mourning the loss of a respected politician, many people all over the world still continue to join them at many international foru...


Three things Govt. needs to do before signing ETCA

12 February 2016

    So the Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) cleverly diverted the public attention on the Economic and Technology Cooperation Framework Agreement (ETCA) formerly known as Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) ...


Columnists More