Home / / Maritime Pattu PS of Mullaitivu

Maritime Pattu PS of Mullaitivu


Comments / 1247 Views / Wednesday, 14 March 2012 00:04


Voters seek CA to restrain election until de-mining and resettlement

By S.S. Selvanayagam

A stay order from the Court of Appeal is being asked by the displaced registered voters against the conducting of elections for the Maritime Pattu (Karaithurai Pattu) Pradeshiya Sabha scheduled to be held on 24 March.

A set of seven petitioners who are living in different places outside the Maritime Pattu in their Writ petition filed in the Court of Appeal seek stay order until the de-mining and resettlement.

J. Ajanthan  and J.J Kumar of Mulliyawavalai M. Jeshilan, Lornad Misiyas, S. Chandrallia, R. Parameshwaran and  S.S Kumar who are residing in Menik Farm, Chettikulam of Vavunia in their petition cited Returning Officers, Elections Commissioner Mahinda Deshapriya, Secretaries of respective political parties of Ilankai Thamil Arasu Kadchi, UPFA, UNP, People’s Liberation Front, Purasavi Peramuna (People’s Front), SLMC and the Secretary to the Ministry of Local Government and Provincial Councils as well as the Attorney General as Respondents.

They in their petition state that nominations for the elections of Maritime Pattu Pradeshiya Sabha were received from 20 to 25 January 2011 by the Returning Officers in respective District of Mullaitivu.

The petitioners are asking the Court to issue a mandate in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the said decision of the Returning Officer and the Elections Commissioner to hold the elections for the Maritime Pattu PS on 24 March.

They are seeking the Court to issue a mandate in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing them not to proceed with the elections until the de-mining and resettlement process is completed and to take consequential steps as required by the law.

They are also asking the Court to issue a mandate in the nature of Mandumus directing them to postpone the said elections until the de-mining and resettlement process is completed.

They are seeking the Court to issue a stay order restraining them from taking any further steps in terms of the Local Authorities Ordinance including the conduct of the said elections scheduled to be held on 24 March.


Share This Article


COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

IMF, McKinsey not the panacea for our ills; decisiveness, empowerment and selfless politicians are essential

28 February 2017

  By a Special Correspondent The past 18 months have been, possibly, one of the darkest, and bleakest, periods, in recent times, for Sri Lankan businesses and entrepreneurs. While there has been an improvement during this...


Philippine lessons for Sri Lanka tourism and economy

28 February 2017

  There has been a continuous debate on evaluating the impact of tourism on a country’s economy. Sri Lanka in particular has grown from $ 500 million in 2009 to $ 4,000 million currently in 2016 which indicates the powe...


Restoring ‘Economic Democracy’: Is it an elusive goal?

27 February 2017

President Maithripala Sirisena Promised delivery of economic democracy to people One of the pledges made by the present Government in its election manifesto titled ‘The Five Point Plan for creating a new country in 60 mont...


Signifying ‘Sigmoid’ for Sri Lankans

27 February 2017

Being proactive is becoming a rarity. Protests for rights have become a regular occurrence. Conducting post-mortems after a tragedy is not something uncommon to us. All of the above point to the need for a fresh approach towards survival and succe...


Columnists More